The Window.
thewindow.fyi
A civic risk tracker
14 indicators · 5 categories · last updated September 14, 2026 A weekly signal check on U.S. conditions.
What is The Window?
The Window tracks signals of democratic backsliding in the U.S. — based on patterns from other countries before they lost their balance of power. Updated every week.
This is not a prediction. It is a record of what is changing — and when.
Current signal level — 0 is calm, 100 is critical
—
calculating...
0 calm25 watch50 prepare75 act100 critical
Last updated: September 14, 2026
Loading...
0–24Stable
25–39Watch
40–54Prepare
55–69Act faster
70–100Don't wait
How the score works
14 signals across 5 areas add up to a number from 0 to 100. Each signal is measured against written criteria so the scoring is consistent week to week.
Community pressure alone does not trigger an urgent warning. Exit and money signals have to move first. High pressure on your community without exit or financial restrictions means the risk is unequal — not universal. The five areas: Can you leave? (max 23) + Is your community targeted? (max 27) + Are courts working? (max 25) + Can you move money? (max 17) + What is the world saying? (max 8) = 100 total.
Scores are analyst judgments checked against published criteria. They are not automated. Signals show increased probability — not certainty. How things unfold varies by situation.
What this means right now
Loading...
—
Can you leave?
—
Being targeted?
—
Courts working?
Move money?
—
World signals
—
Score history
Apr 9 → May 4 → May 28 → Jun 1 → Jun 10 → Jun 29 → Sep 9 → Sep 14, 2026
Weekly risk score history.
US domestic
International press
Financial intelligence

Can you leave the country?

max 23 pts 0 / 23
Can the government stop you from leaving?
max 10 pts high confidence
This tracks whether any law or order has been signed that would stop U.S. citizens from leaving the country. Right now there are none. But some members of Congress have talked about creating one. We watch for the first sign this changes.
Can you still get a passport?
max 7 pts high confidence
This tracks whether passports are being delayed, denied, or blocked for certain groups of people. Right now processing times are normal. One exception: the government no longer issues passports showing a gender other than male or female. People who identify as nonbinary or transgender can no longer get a passport that reflects their identity.
Can you still book a flight out?
max 6 pts high confidence
This tracks whether flights out of the U.S. are being cancelled or blocked. Right now you can still fly internationally. Some disruptions have happened for weather and business reasons — not government orders.

Your personal checklist

not included in the score
The score tracks what the system is doing. This checklist tracks what you are doing. Each unchecked item is a gap between knowing and being able to act.
☐ Passports renewed (all family members)
☐ Destination country identified
☐ Funds accessible outside primary U.S. bank
☐ School / kids logistics resolved
☐ Exit timeline and trigger defined
Every unresolved item is a gap between your awareness and your ability to act. The system risk score tells you when. This checklist tells you whether you can.

Is your community being targeted?

max 27 pts 0 / 27
Are people being arrested or deported in large numbers?
max 13 pts high confidence
This tracks how many people are being arrested and held by immigration officers. ICE arrested over 50,000 people in both July and August 2026 — setting new records each month. That is about 1,600 arrests per day. Over 300,000 people have been arrested so far in 2026. Arrests are now happening at airports, courthouses, and immigration check-in offices. Two immigrants were killed during traffic stops in Texas and Maine. 12,000 new agents have been hired. ICE was awarded a $16.7 million contract for shock gloves.
June 1 update (9 → 10): [FACT] 32,531 people booked into detention in March 2026. Collateral arrests over 50% in D.C. Operations confirmed as routine and widespread.

September 9 update (10 → 11): [FACT] Monthly arrests nearly doubled from March to August — from 32,531 to 50,925. ICE is averaging 1,600 arrests per day. Over 300,000 arrests in the first eight months of 2026. Two immigrants killed during enforcement traffic stops in July. A nun arrested walking to church in Texas. An Alaska state attorney arrested. ICE awarded $16.7M for shock gloves. DHS banned undocumented people from domestic flights. 12,000 new agents hired. [ANALYSIS] For comparison, ICE arrested 74,000 people in all of fiscal year 2021. The current pace would reach over 600,000 in 2026 — more than eight times that level. Arrests are no longer limited to homes and workplaces — they are happening at airports, courthouses, and scheduled check-ins. [SIGNAL] When enforcement reaches people who are legally present, people in churches and courthouses, and people are being killed during routine stops — the system has moved beyond targeted enforcement into something broader.
Are people losing their legal protections?
max 9 pts medium confidence
This tracks whether laws that protect people are being taken away. On June 30 the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold birthright citizenship — striking down the president's executive order. This is the strongest counter-signal since the tracker launched: the courts said no. But on June 25, the same court ruled 6-3 that courts cannot review the president's decision to end TPS — meaning 330,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians now face deportation with no legal recourse. The same day, the court ruled the government can turn back asylum seekers at the border before they touch U.S. soil. DACA is severely weakened. The score stays at 9/9 because TPS and metering remain in effect — but the birthright win proves the system is not fully broken.
June 29 update (8 → 9): [FACT] TPS ended and declared unreviewable. Metering upheld. Score moved to maximum.

September 9 — counter-signal noted: [FACT] On June 30, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Constitution guarantees birthright citizenship to virtually all children born in the U.S. Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion. The president's executive order was struck down as unconstitutional. [ANALYSIS] This is the first major ruling against the administration's immigration agenda at the Supreme Court level. It proves that the court can and will block executive action on core constitutional questions — even while it rules in the administration's favor on other immigration issues. [SIGNAL] The score stays at 9/9 because TPS termination and metering are still in full effect. But this ruling is the most significant positive signal the tracker has recorded. The courts are not fully captured. The Constitution held on this one.
Is the government using harmful language about certain groups?
max 5 pts medium confidence
This tracks whether government officials are using language that treats certain groups of people as less than human. This matters because history shows that harmful language from officials usually comes before harmful actions. Right now the word "invasion" appears in official government releases. Cabinet members have said they want "the right kind of immigrants."

Are the courts still working?

max 25 pts 0 / 25
Is the president gaining too much power?
max 10 pts high confidence
This tracks whether the president is gaining power that other parts of the government can't check. On June 29, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Trump v. Slaughter that the president can fire the heads of independent agencies — like the Federal Trade Commission and the Election Assistance Commission — without needing a reason. This overturns 91 years of precedent. The president now has legal control over the entire executive branch. Days after the ruling, Trump fired Election Assistance Commission members. Courts and Congress have not stopped most of these actions.
May 28 update (6 → 7): [FACT] Multiple federal judges documented in writing that the administration is ignoring their rulings. [ANALYSIS] Courts themselves described this as a broader strategy, not isolated cases.

September 14 update (7 → 8): [FACT] On June 29, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Trump v. Slaughter that the president can fire members of independent agencies at will, without needing cause. This overturns 91 years of precedent set by Humphrey's Executor v. U.S. (1935). The ruling endorses the "unitary executive theory" — the idea that the president should have total control over the entire executive branch. Days after the ruling, Trump fired Election Assistance Commission members. Justice Jackson wrote in dissent that the court was contorting the law so the president "always wins." [ANALYSIS] This is not defiance of courts — this is the courts giving the president more power. The independence of agencies like the FTC, SEC, and potentially the Federal Reserve is now in question. [SIGNAL] When independent agencies lose their independence, the president controls enforcement of financial rules, election oversight, consumer protection, and market regulation. That concentration of power in one person is one of the clearest markers in the historical record of democratic backsliding.
Are people being punished for speaking up?
max 9 pts medium confidence
This tracks whether people are being arrested or charged for protesting or speaking out. It also tracks whether certain groups are losing their ability to vote or be represented. The number of journalist arrests is not higher than past years — 147 were arrested in 2020 during Black Lives Matter protests. What is different now is how serious the charges are. In 2020, journalists were held and released. In 2026, journalists are being charged with serious federal crimes for covering protests — using laws that were originally written to prosecute the Ku Klux Klan. Covering the news is now being treated as a criminal act.
May 19 update (4 → 5): [FACT] The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to weaken a law used to challenge voting maps that make it harder for certain groups to elect the representatives they choose (Louisiana v. Callais). The court acted quickly — skipping its normal waiting period — to let states redraw maps before the 2026 elections. Between 12 and 19 voting districts where Black or Latino voters are the majority are now at risk of being redrawn. [ANALYSIS] This makes it harder for these communities to challenge maps that reduce their voting power in court. [SIGNAL] Historically, reducing the ability of certain groups to vote or be represented has been an early sign of democratic backsliding in other countries.
Are judges still stopping the government when it goes too far?
max 6 pts medium confidence
This tracks whether courts are still able to block the government when it breaks the law. Courts are still ruling against the government in many cases — judges have blocked actions on immigration, education, and federal spending. But the Supreme Court has made it harder for courts to protect large groups of people at once. Government actions are being approved through a fast-track process with little review.
May 11 update (4 → 5): [FACT] The Supreme Court used its fast-track process to allow expanded immigration stops in Los Angeles while a legal challenge was still ongoing. Three justices said in writing that the conditions of those stops could lead to people being stopped based on how they look, speak, and what work they appear to do. [ANALYSIS] Multiple justices have now said the fast-track process is being used to give the government more power with less review. Courts are still blocking many government actions. Score holds at 5/6.

June 1 correction: A previous update incorrectly cited the DOJ lawsuit against Maryland federal judges as a new June 2026 development. [FACT] That lawsuit was filed in June 2025 and dismissed in August 2025 by a Trump-appointed judge who wrote the executive branch "must find a proper way to raise those concerns." The case was then filed to be dismissed as moot in January 2026. It does not support a score increase. Score holds at 5/6.

Can you still move your money?

max 17 pts 0 / 17
Can you still send or move money freely?
max 7 pts high confidence
This tracks whether the government is making it harder for immigrants to use banks or move money. On May 20, 2026 the president signed an order directing banks to treat immigration status as a financial risk factor. People who are not U.S. citizens — even those with permanent legal status like a green card — are now banned from the government's main small business loan program. A rule that protected immigrants from being denied banking because of their immigration status was quietly cancelled. You can still move money freely right now — but the rules are changing.
June 1 update (1 → 2): [FACT] Trump signed an executive order on May 20, 2026 directing banks to flag immigration status as a financial risk. The order stops short of requiring citizenship checks for every account — but it directs regulators to issue guidance within 60 days on "red flags" tied to immigration status. The SBA 7(a) small business loan ban for all noncitizens including permanent residents is already in effect. The CFPB advisory protecting immigrants from immigration-based discrimination in credit decisions was withdrawn. [ANALYSIS] These are not restrictions on moving money out of the country. But they change who can access financial services based on immigration status — which disproportionately affects people who pay taxes and contribute to the economy. [SIGNAL] Historically, restricting financial access by identity category precedes broader financial control measures.
Are big companies leaving the U.S.?
max 5 pts watch
This tracks whether large companies are moving out of the U.S. because they are worried about conditions here. Right now most moves are happening inside the U.S. — from one state to another. A small number of companies have moved internationally for political reasons. We watch this because businesses often move before people do.
Are wealthy people quietly preparing to leave?
max 5 pts watch
This tracks whether people with money and options are applying for citizenship in other countries or moving their money abroad. Right now Americans are applying for foreign citizenship in record numbers — up 75% in one year. But data shows billionaires specifically are mostly moving within the U.S., not leaving it. The signal we are watching is actual confirmed departures citing political risk. We are not there yet — but the applications signal that people are building an exit door even if they have not walked through it. The indicator to watch next: when wealthy people stop buying property in the U.S. and start buying it abroad instead. Note: the main source for application data makes money helping people get foreign citizenship — treat as directional only.
Current read (May 4, 2026): Moved to 3/5. Americans are now the largest group applying for foreign citizenship globally — up 75% in 2025. Source note: the company reporting this data makes money by helping people get foreign citizenship. Treat as a general trend only. We also check U.S. Treasury data and international financial press to confirm the direction.

What is the rest of the world saying?

max 8 pts 0 / 8
Are other countries warning their people about the U.S.?
max 5 pts high confidence
This tracks whether friendly countries are telling their own citizens to be careful when visiting or living in the U.S. Right now Canada, the UK, Australia, Germany, and France have all issued warnings. Canada specifically warns LGBTQ+ travelers. Germany warns about what happens if you overstay even by one day. These countries have no reason to exaggerate — they are protecting their own people.
Is the U.S. being pushed out of the world community?
max 3 pts high confidence
This tracks whether the U.S. is pulling away from — or being pushed out of — groups of countries that work together on shared problems. The U.S. has left 66 of these international groups, including the World Health Organization. Judges from friendly countries who work at a world court that handles serious crimes had their credit cards cancelled because the U.S. put them on a sanctions list. Other countries are starting to leave the U.S. out of decisions and work around it instead.

Where the information comes from

every source has an owner — we list them

Every source has an owner. We list who controls each one so you can judge it yourself.

Source What it tracks Who controls it
Federal Register / White HouseExecutive orders, legal mechanismsU.S. executive branch — primary source, read critically
State Dept / travel.state.govPassports, travel advisoriesSec. Marco Rubio — government source, cross-reference
ICE / CBPEnforcement operations, borderDHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin / CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott
CIVICUS MonitorCivic space ratings by countryGlobal civil society alliance — no government funding, centers local orgs
ACLEDPolitical violence & protest eventsUniv. of Sussex / Peace Research Institute Oslo — no U.S. government funding
RSF (Reporters Without Borders)Press freedom indexDir. General Thibaut Bruttin — French nonprofit, no U.S. funding
CPJ (Committee to Protect Journalists)Journalist arrests and prosecutionIndependent nonprofit — no government funding
Human Rights WatchHuman rights documentationInternational NGO — does not accept government funding
UN Human Rights / OHCHRInternational rights assessmentsUN body — intergovernmental, formally independent of member states
Venice CommissionRule of law, judicial independenceCouncil of Europe advisory body — no U.S. political stake
PRIO (Peace Research Inst. Oslo)Conflict, political risk researchNorwegian government funded — academic independence, no U.S. stake
ISS AfricaDemocratic backsliding comparisonSouth African institute — applies frameworks from countries that have experienced closure
El Universal / Proceso / Clarín / TeleSURU.S. immigration as seen from Latin AmericaMexican and Argentine press — reporting on their own people, no U.S. editorial filter
BBC / The Guardian / Reuters / Al Jazeera / Der Spiegel / Deutsche WelleGeneral international reportingBritish, Qatari, UK/international, German — no U.S. political ownership
Financial Times / Nikkei / HandelsblattCapital flows, corporate movesUK/Japanese/German financial press — no U.S. political stake
Henley & PartnersMillionaire migration, citizenship demandCEO Dr. Juerg Steffen — private consultancy, financial incentive to show demand. Use directionally only; methodology has known limitations.